Danie Visser vs Jay Lapidus Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Visser vs J. Lapidus

Danie Visser

RSA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Jay Lapidus

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Head-To-Head: Visser 1 - 1 Lapidus

They have played 5 sets in total, with Danie Visser winning 2 and Jay Lapidus winning 3. The last match between Danie Visser and Jay Lapidus was at the Johannesburg, 17-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 6-1 6-7 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Visser	1
Lapidus	1

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Johannesburg(11-17-86)

Stats

Danie Visser

Jay Lapidus

(R3) Paris Indoor(10-25-82)

Stats

Jay Lapidus

Danie Visser

D. Visser vs J. Lapidus H2H Profile

D. Visser	Stats	J. Lapidus
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.05% (111-141)	Career Total W/L	44.08% (93-118)
1	Hard	1
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Visser vs J. Lapidus Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Danie Visser has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jay Lapidus has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Danie Visser, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jay Lapidus has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Danie Visser has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jay Lapidus has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Danie Visser has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jay Lapidus winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/ 17). Jay Lapidus has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 50/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 20/ 28).
Player level: In the last year, Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Jay Lapidus has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Danie Visser winning 1 times and Jay Lapidus being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Danie Visser winning 2 and Jay Lapidus winning 3. The last match between Danie Visser and Jay Lapidus was at the Johannesburg, 17-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 6-1 6-7 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Danie Visser has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jay Lapidus has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Danie Visser has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jay Lapidus has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Danie Visser has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jay Lapidus has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Danie Visser vs Jay Lapidus Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Visser vs J. Lapidus H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Visser	Stats	J. Lapidus
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
25	Games Won	25
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Lapidus Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven CH - 10-08-1987
R3 Craig A MillerC. A	W	6-3 1-6 6-4	Stats
R4 David DowlenD. Dowlen	W	7-6 6-1	Stats
QF Rick LeachR. Leach	L	7-6 4-6 6-3	Stats
Washington - 27-07-1987
R2 Mark KratzmannM. Kratzmann	W	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Jay BergerJ. Berger	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Visser vs J. Lapidus Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Visser	Stats	J. Lapidus
44.05% (111/141)	YTD Win/Loss	44.08% (93/118)
46.67% (315/360)	Sets Win/Loss	45.66% (242/288)
49.16% (3314/3427)	Games Win/Loss	47.82% (2435/2657)
45.19% (61/74)	Hard Win/Loss	47.62% (50/55)
26.09% (6/17)	Clay Win/Loss	41.67% (20/28)
48.00% (12/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	35.00% (7/13)
46.38% (32/37)	Grass Win/Loss	42.11% (16/22)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
379.74	Average Opponent Rank	485.27
48.94% (23/24)	Slam W/L	42.31% (11/15)
41.38% (12/17)	Masters W/L	33.33% (3/6)
39.31% (57/88)	Main Tour W/L	42.18% (62/85)
61.29% (19/12)	Challenger W/L	58.62% (17/12)
43% (85/199)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	44% (80/181)
48% (25/52)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	39% (11/28)
67% (2/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
42% (37/89)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (28/66)
72% (121/87)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (94/75)
28% (121/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (94/19)
18% (130/23)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (115/16)